Courtesy of
Sky & Telescope
April 1995 |
S & T TEST REPORT
The JMI MOTOTRAK V
by Dennis di Cicco
Aperture Envy. While
many amateurs first caught this bug when it reached near-epidemic proportions
during the Dobsonian revolution of the late '70s and early '80s,
astrophotographers were afflicted with it long ago. For years I've collected
countless items as part of a master plan to build ever bigger telescopes. But
the digital revolution has altered my thinking.
The dream of having a bigger telescope hasn't died; it
just dropped a few notches on the priority list. My 11-inch Schmidt-Cassegrain
that once struggled to record 16th-magnitude stars photographically now
routinely reaches 19th magnitude with CCD exposures that are not only shorter
but also more affected by growing light pollution.
While CCDs put my aperture envy into remission, they
brought about a new problem, one a friend aptly described as "drive
envy." A good drive certainly makes an astrophotographer's life easier,
even though long-exposure photographs still have to be guided. Autoguiders have
lightened the burden, but they take time to set up properly. Fifteen minutes
spent readying an autoguider is a minor price to pay for a 1-hour exposure, but
it's a lot of overhead for a 3-minute CCD image.
Exposures that short don't need guiding, if the
telescope drive is first rate. Technological advances first gave us better
gears. By the late 1980s I was testing production telescopes with periodic
errors smaller than 20 arc seconds. Then the electronic revolution came to
amateur telescopes. Both Celestron with its PEC and Meade with its Smart Drive
reduced errors into the 5-arc second range. Edward R. Byers Co. has even come
out with a mounting and computerized tangent drive that one astrophotographer
says has "no discernible periodic error."
But where does all this leave those of us who use old
telescopes?
JMI to the Rescue
Almost as soon as the
term PEC (periodic-error correction) became main-stream jargon, JMI introduced
its Mototrak V and the promise of periodic-error correction for many old
telescopes. These include ones with worm-gear drives having 360, 359, 144, and
96 teeth, as well as the unusual 216-tooth gears found in the 11- and 14-inch
Celestron. (You must identify your drive when ordering the Mototrak V, since its
electronics are customized for the rotational period of the worm.) The dual-axis
drive corrector (it operates a declination motor too) has additional outputs to
control a variable-speed, focusing motor and make an illuminated guiding reticle
blink. Other Mototrak V features include selectable drive rates, one of which
can be programmed by the user, and an optional rechargeable battery for
self-contained operation.
All this fits neatly into a hand-held package weighing
a mere 12½ ounces (the optional battery adds 7 ounces more). I found the unit
easy to operate when holding it with two hands, but it is a bit awkward for
single-hand operation. This is especially true if it is powered by an external
12-volt DC source (a wall transformer and cigarette-lighter adapter are standard
accessories), since wires then extend from the top and bottom of the unit. There
is a modular jack for inputting signals from an autoguider. JMI also offers an
optional hand control that plugs into this jack so you can guide a telescope
without having to hold the Mototrak itself.
The feature that most intrigues me is the PEC. It
really works! My 1982-vintage, 11-inch Celestron has a periodic error of 35 arc
seconds. Unfortunately, much of this error occurs in a small segment of the
worm's 6.7-minute period. Yet my very first attempt to "train" the
Mototrak by manually guiding the telescope during one revolution of the worm
reduced the periodic error to about 5 arc seconds. To quote from my notes:
"Wow!"
How much you can reduce a drive's periodic error
depends on how well you guide the telescope during the training session. It is
possible to have an autoguider do the work, but there's a catch. The Mototrak
can "remember" only a maximum of 125 corrections during a revolution
of the worm. For my "slow" worm, this works out to no more than about
one correction every 3 seconds, which to too leisurely for the quality of
guiding I want during the worst part of my worm's cycle. Setting the autoguider
to make more frequent corrections can exceed the 125 limit, ruining the training
session. (This will be even more of a problem for people whose drives have 144-
and 96-tooth worm wheels and worm periods of 10 and 15 minutes, respectively.)
My solution was to train the Mototrak manually, being careful to make minimal
corrections during the part of the worm's cycle that had little error. Finally,
Mototrak V has user-selected high- and low-speed guiding rates. Either can be
used for training the PEC, but switching to the other mode renders the training
useless.
PEC training is retained even when the drive is
switched off. Over several seconds the electronics slow the motor and remember
where in the worm cycle it stopped. Over three weeks and a dozen on-offs, the
PEC seemed to maintain its accuracy.
Another Mototrak feature I like is the user-programmed
drive rate. Any frequency from 40 to 80 hertz can be set with a precision of
0.002 Hz. This is great for homemade drives that have odd gearing, or for
achieving unusual rates for special applications. Unfortunately, the PEC does
not function with these non-standard rates.
The optional rechargeable battery pack is a standard
Radio Shack item, and it drove my scope for about 5 hours, long enough for a
typical evening under the stars. The pack requires 14 to 16 hours to fully
recharge with a small wall transformer.
With the Mototrak V, JMI has once again developed a
product that gives old telescopes the ability to keep pace with state-of-the-art
instruments that are redefining the way amateurs do astronomy.
|